How sustainable is Whole Foods’ competitive advantage?

Whole Foods Market Inc. (WFM) is a chain of grocery stores focused on providing organic and natural foods, with approximately 490 stores as of October 2018. Build an economic moat with brand strength. The company was acquired by Amazon in 2017, but continues to operate as a subsidiary under its original name.

Buffett’s economic moat

Warren Buffett is considered one of the most famous value investors, and his strategy is based on identifying companies that generate cash flow growth through a moat of a sustainable economy. The economic moat is a safe competitive advantage derived from economies of scale, a strong brand image, intellectual property rights, network effects, regulatory protection, or an excellent corporate culture.

Without such a moat, the company’s profit margin is destined to succumb to competitiveness, and ultimately cannot be equal to the marginal cost of capital. This kind of equilibrium will not produce economic profits, and it also eliminates investment incentives.

READ ALSO:   What do upstream and downstream mean in business?

Analysis of the Moat in the Grocery Market

Whole Foods’ scale has a competitive advantage over its more direct competitors. The profit rate and economic profit indicators confirm the existence of an economic moat. As long as larger competitors do not enter the organic and natural food market more directly, this moat is sustainable, but this kind of competition may lead to a rapid deterioration of any competitive advantage.

The grocery market is highly competitive, and switching costs are basically zero. Competitive advantages are difficult to obtain. Successful companies usually choose superior store locations, obtain better conditions from suppliers, operate an efficient supply chain and effectively manage their product supply and inventory. Intellectual property, regulatory protection, and network effects are generally not important among established industry players.

Whole Foods is not as large as Kroger (KR), Wal-Mart (WMT), Costco (COST), Albertsons, Safeway and Publix and other largest supermarkets, hypermarkets and discount club stores enjoy. However, with Amazon’s support, this situation may change in the near future.

READ ALSO:   mom and pop

However, Whole Foods targets a more specific market, focusing on organic and natural foods. Compared with more direct competitors such as The Fresh Market, Trader Joe’s and Sprouts Farmers’ Markets (SFM), it has an advantage of scale. This scale forms a moat with its closest competitor, but it does not apply to the broader grocery market. If the largest grocers strategically enter the organic market segment, this advantage of scale may dissipate.

The competitive advantage of Whole Foods

Whole Foods’ strong brand image may be its biggest source of competitive advantage. The company has become a leader in organic and natural foods and has invested heavily in store quality and customer service. These factors differentiate it from other grocery stores and cultivate a relatively loyal customer base. In order to maintain this reputation, the company will have to continue to be among the industry leaders in terms of facility investment. It may also incur high labor costs to keep customer service up to its high standards. These drags on earnings and cash flow were partially offset by the increase in pricing power.

READ ALSO:   mass customization

Due to its scale and brand influence, Whole Foods certainly has a competitive advantage, but it is limited to its niche market to some extent. The grocery market is ultimately fierce and mature. The sustainability of Whole Foods’ competitive advantage depends, at least in the short term, on the unwillingness or inability of its larger competitors to enter the organic market.

Economic moats usually bring high and stable profit margins. Whole Foods is the industry leader, with gross profit margins generally above 30%, and operating profit margins are also among the best.


Share your love